Audi TT 2007 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 115 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 129 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Megane 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 18 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 60 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Renault Megane has
| |