Audi TT 2007 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 141 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger, but lower. Audi TT is 31 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 15 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 190 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |