Audi TT 2007 vs BMW Z4 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 15 HP less power than BMW Z4, but torque is 5 NM more than BMW Z4. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW Z4 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 9 cm longer than the BMW Z4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Audi TT has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |