Audi TT 2007 vs BMW 3 series 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 22 HP less power than BMW 3 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2007 3.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine. Most of the problems are related to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high-pressure fuel pump were common in ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
| Audi TT is 40 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 350 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`790 kg | 2`135 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`470 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 320 kg | 355 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |