Audi TT 2008 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 18 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 60 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Renault Megane has
| |