Audi TT 2008 vs Volvo C70 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo C70, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 40 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 404 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |