Audi TT 2008 vs Mazda MX-5 2006

 
Audi TT
2008 - 2010
Mazda MX-5
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Petrol
Diesel (Audi TT) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda MX-5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 170 HP126 HP
Torque: 350 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds9.6 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 44 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 183 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.57.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway860 km on highway
960 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda SuperbUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda MX-5 2006 1.8 engine: The engine often has unstable idling speeds and problems with the thermostat.

Dimensions

Length: 4.18 m4.00 m
Width: 1.84 m1.72 m
Height: 1.36 m1.26 m
Audi TT is larger.
Audi TT is 18 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres150 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Audi TT has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7351`355
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 98005400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv