Audi TT 2008 vs BMW 6 series 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 580 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
BMW 6 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 116 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 230 NM less than BMW 6 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 6 sērija 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW 6 sērija 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.37 m | |
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 64 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 300 litres | |
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 50 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 2`260 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |