Audi TT 2010 vs Volvo S60 2015
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 82 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Volvo S60 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |