Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2008

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
Mazda MX-5
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 272 HP161 HP
Torque: 350 NM188 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds8.9 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 111 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 162 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.7 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.02 m
Width: 1.84 m1.72 m
Height: 1.35 mno data
Trunk capacity: 250 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`795no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Mazda MX-5 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv