Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 360 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 465 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 199 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 277 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |