Audi TT 2010 vs BMW Z4 2009

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
BMW Z4
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 360 HP204 HP
Torque: 465 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 seconds7.3 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 156 HP more power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 215 NM more than BMW Z4. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.68.2
Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway900 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.24 m
Width: 1.84 m1.79 m
Height: 1.35 m1.29 m
Audi TT is 4 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres180 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data310 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8551`760
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): no data18 600
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv