Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 360 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 465 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 200 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 277 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda MX-5 2013 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 18 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 150 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda MX-5 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |