Audi TT 2010 vs BMW Z4 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 360 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 465 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 156 HP more power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 215 NM more than BMW Z4. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The BMW Z4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW Z4 2009 2.5 engine: On this engine, the valve seals and crankcase breather valve diaphragm tend to fail after 80-100 000 km, leading to increased oil consumption. It is recommended to choose engines manufactured in the last years ... More about BMW Z4 2009 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.29 m | |
Audi TT is 4 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 180 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 310 litres | |
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`735 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |