Audi TT 2010 vs BMW Z4 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW Z4, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.29 m | |
| Audi TT is 5 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW Z4 has
| |