Audi TT 2010 vs Mazda MX-5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 162 NM more than Mazda MX-5. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.0 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda MX-5 2013 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 17 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 150 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda MX-5 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda MX-5 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |