Audi TT 2010 vs Volvo S60 2015
| Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 44 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Volvo S60 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S60 has
| |