Audi TT 2003 vs BMW 1 series 2006
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 265 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 315 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Audi TT engine produces 15 HP less power than BMW 1 series, but torque is 5 NM more than BMW 1 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 480 km with real consumption | ||
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW 1 sērija 2006 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2006 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.43 m | |
Audi TT is 19 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 330 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 110 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1 metres less than that of the BMW 1 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`905 | 1`890 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | average | |
Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |