Audi TT 2003 vs Audi TT 2006

 
Audi TT
2003 - 2006
Audi TT
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP250 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 seconds5.7 seconds
Audi TT 2003 and Audi TT 2006 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi TT 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.89.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km10.0 l/100km
By specification Audi TT 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT 2003 could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT 2003 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2006.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway820 km on highway
630 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.18 m
Width: 1.76 m1.84 m
Height: 1.34 m1.35 m
Audi TT 2003 is smaller.
Audi TT 2003 is 14 cm shorter than the Audi TT 2006, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT 2003 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres290 litres
Audi TT 2006 has more luggage space.
Audi TT 2003 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT 2006.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT 2003 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi TT 2006, which means Audi TT 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9051`830
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 44008200
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv