Audi TT 2005 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 47 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.32 m | |
| Audi TT is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |