Audi TT 1998 vs Renault Megane 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 225 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 85 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.37 m | |
Audi TT is larger, but slightly lower. Audi TT is 7 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 288 litres | |
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Audi TT has 68 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. This could mean that the Audi TT uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`555 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Renault Megane has
| |