Audi TT 1998 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 225 HP | 192 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 33 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.32 m | |
Audi TT is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |