Audi TT 1998 vs Mazda RX-8 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 33 HP more power than Mazda RX-8, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Mazda RX-8. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 13.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda RX-8, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda RX-8. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 460 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda RX-8 2003 1.3 engine: This rotor motor is very specific and capricious. It will suit the true enthusiast who is prepared to put up with high fuel and oil consumption as well as relatively frequent maintenance and repair work. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 39 cm shorter than the Mazda RX-8, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
|
Mazda RX-8 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mazda RX-8. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda RX-8, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |