Audi TT 1998 vs Jaguar XK 2002

 
Audi TT
1998 - 2005
Jaguar XK
2002 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol4.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 225 HP400 HP
Torque: 280 NM553 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 seconds5.4 seconds
Jaguar XK is a more dynamic driving.
Audi TT engine produces 175 HP less power than Jaguar XK, whereas torque is 273 NM less than Jaguar XK. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.412.4
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway820 km on highway
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.78 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.34 m1.30 m
Audi TT is smaller, but slightly higher.
Audi TT is 74 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres327 litres
Jaguar XK has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 107 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XK.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1 metres less than that of the Jaguar XK, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8502`104
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 460013 600
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Jaguar XK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv