Audi TT 1998 vs Jaguar XK 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 225 HP | 400 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 553 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
Jaguar XK is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 175 HP less power than Jaguar XK, whereas torque is 273 NM less than Jaguar XK. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 12.4 | |
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
Audi TT is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi TT is 74 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 327 litres | |
Jaguar XK has more luggage space. Audi TT has 107 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XK. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1 metres less than that of the Jaguar XK, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`104 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 13 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |