Audi TT 1998 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 100 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Ford Puma. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 6 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Ford Puma has
| |