Audi TT 1998 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 32 HP more power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 18 NM less than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 12.0 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 62 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
| |