Audi TT 1998 vs Ford Mustang 2005

 
Audi TT
1998 - 2005
Ford Mustang
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol4.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 225 HP304 HP
Torque: 280 NM427 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 secondsn/a seconds
Audi TT engine produces 79 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 147 NM less than Ford Mustang.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.413.0
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle460 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway670 km on highway
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.77 m
Width: 1.76 m1.88 m
Height: 1.34 m1.39 m
Audi TT is smaller.
Audi TT is 73 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres350 litres
Ford Mustang has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 130 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang.
Turning diameter: 10 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`850no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 460010 000
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Ford Mustang has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv