Audi TT 1998 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2003

 
Audi TT
1998 - 2005
Chrysler Crossfire
2003 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 225 HP218 HP
Torque: 280 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 seconds6.5 seconds
Audi TT engine produces 7 HP more power than Chrysler Crossfire, but torque is 30 NM less than Chrysler Crossfire. Despite the higher power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.410.1
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway770 km on highway
620 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.06 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.34 m1.30 m
Audi TT is smaller, but slightly higher.
Audi TT is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Crossfire, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres215 litres
Audi TT has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Crossfire.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`665
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 44006000
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv