Audi TT 1998 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 22 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro, but torque is 25 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.0 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller, but slightly higher. Audi TT is 88 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 923 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Audi TT has 703 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |