Audi TT 1998 vs BMW 6 series 2004

 
Audi TT
1998 - 2005
BMW 6 series
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 225 HP258 HP
Torque: 280 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 seconds6.7 seconds
Audi TT engine produces 33 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 20 NM less than BMW 6 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.5
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km11.1 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway1000 km on highway
620 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
BMW 6 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
BMW 6 sērija 2004 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ...  More about BMW 6 sērija 2004 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.82 m
Width: 1.76 m1.86 m
Height: 1.34 m1.37 m
Audi TT is smaller.
Audi TT is 78 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres450 litres
BMW 6 series has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 230 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`960
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 46009400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
BMW 6 sērija has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv