Audi TT 2005 vs Audi A3 2006

 
Audi TT
2005 - 2006
Audi A3
2006 - 2008
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP160 HP
Torque: 240 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds8 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 30 HP more power than Audi A3, but torque is 10 NM less than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.17.5
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.29 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.35 m1.42 m
Audi TT is 25 cm shorter than the Audi A3, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1120 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7051`935
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44003200
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Audi A3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv