Audi TT 2003 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi TT 2003 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.30 m | |
| Audi TT is 38 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 283 litres | |
| Audi TT has 13 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |