Audi TT 2002 vs Mini Cooper S 2010

Audi TT
2002 - 2005
Mini Cooper S
2010 - 2013
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain


Power: 180 HP184 HP
Torque: 235 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds7.2 seconds
Mini Cooper S is a more dynamic driving.
Audi TT engine produces 4 HP less power than Mini Cooper S, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mini Cooper S. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.16.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.2 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Mini Cooper S is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 405 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway1000 km on highway
540 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Mini Cooper S gets more mileage on one fuel tank.


Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Leon, Seat ToledoUsed also on Mini Countryman
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect.


Length: 4.04 m3.73 m
Width: 1.76 m1.68 m
Height: 1.35 m1.41 m
Audi TT is larger, but lower.
Audi TT is 31 cm longer than the Mini Cooper S, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres160 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Audi TT has 110 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper S.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7051`615
Safety: no data
above average
no data
Average price (€): 46008800
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mini Cooper S has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: