Audi TT 1998 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 55 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | Used also on Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.32 m | |
| Audi TT is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |