Audi TT 1998 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 124 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 192 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 13.0 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 73 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
540 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Audi TT has 80 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |