Audi TT 1998 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 5 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Brera, but torque is 5 NM more than Alfa Romeo Brera. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Brera, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 159, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 37 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Brera, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
540 litres | 610 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Brera has more luggage space. Audi TT has 30 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Brera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Alfa Romeo Brera (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Brera, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Alfa Romeo Brera has
| |