Audi TT 2008 vs BMW 1 series 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 122 HP more power than BMW 1 series, whereas torque is 180 NM more than BMW 1 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 1 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 1 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 1 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 1 sērija 2008 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2008 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 16 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 370 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 80 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |