Audi TT 2006 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Audi TT and Volkswagen Scirocco have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
| By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Tiguan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
| Audi TT is 8 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 755 litres | |
| Audi TT has 2 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Scirocco has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |