Audi TT 2006 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 60 HP more power than Volkswagen Scirocco, but torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Scirocco. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Scirocco gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Scirocco might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Scirocco 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
| Audi TT is 8 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1006 litres | |
| Audi TT has 2 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Scirocco has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |