Audi TT 2006 vs Hyundai Coupe 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 200 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 57 HP more power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 400'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Coupe engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine Hyundai Coupe 2006 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Coupe 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.33 m | |
Audi TT is 22 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 312 litres | |
Hyundai Coupe has more luggage space. Audi TT has 22 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`740 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |