Audi TT 2006 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 104 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 147 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 13.0 | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Audi TT consumes 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 795 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 59 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Audi TT has 60 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |