Audi TT 2006 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Audi TT 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT 2006 engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi TT 1998, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Audi TT 1998. Thanks to more power Audi TT 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT 2006 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 1998, which means that by driving the Audi TT 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT 2006 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT 1998 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT 1998 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine: This engine is often noted for its excessive oil consumption and significant carbon buildup, which primarily affect intake valves and the intake geometry adjustment mechanism. The oil consumption issue can be ... More about Audi TT 2006 2.0 engine Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km. The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Audi TT 2006 is larger. Audi TT 2006 is 14 cm longer than the Audi TT 1998, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 270 litres | |
| Audi TT 2006 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT 1998. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT 2006 is 1 metres more than that of the Audi TT 1998, which means Audi TT 2006 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |