Audi TT 2008 vs Renault Laguna 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Laguna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 46 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 423 litres | |
|
Renault Laguna has more luggage space. Audi TT has 133 litres less trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`972 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Laguna has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |