Audi TT 2008 vs Hyundai Coupe 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Audi TT) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Coupe) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 27 HP more power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 164 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai Coupe 2006 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Coupe 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.33 m | |
| Audi TT is 22 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 8 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 312 litres | |
|
Hyundai Coupe has more luggage space. Audi TT has 22 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |