Audi TT 2008 vs Alfa Romeo Brera 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 15 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Brera, but torque is 120 NM more than Alfa Romeo Brera. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Brera, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 6.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 159, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
| Audi TT is 23 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Brera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
| Audi TT has 10 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.3 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Brera. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Alfa Romeo Brera has
| |