Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 122 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 200 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW Z4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 3 sērija 2006 2.5 engine: On this engine, the valve seals and crankcase breather valve diaphragm tend to fail after 80-100 000 km, leading to increased oil consumption. It is recommended to choose engines manufactured in the last years ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2006 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.40 m | |
| Audi TT is 38 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 440 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 148 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 385 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |