Audi TT 2010 vs Volvo V70 2009
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 109 HP more power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Volvo V70. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 62 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Audi TT has 283 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |