Audi TT 2010 vs Audi A5 2011
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Audi TT and Audi A5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 53 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A5 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi A5 has
| |