Audi TT 2010 vs Renault Megane 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1130 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Megane 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 344 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 377 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Audi TT has 52 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`773 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Renault Megane has
| |