Audi TT 2010 vs Renault Megane 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1500 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Megane 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
| Audi TT is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 4 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 344 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 991 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Audi TT has 52 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`849 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Renault Megane has
| |